This is to inform that by clicking on the hyperlink, you will be
leaving
sc.com/sg
and entering a website operated by other parties.
Such links are only provided on our website for the convenience of
the Client and Standard Chartered Bank does not control or endorse
such websites, and is not responsible for their contents.
The use of such website is also subject to the terms of use and
other terms and guidelines, if any, contained within each such
website. In the event that any of the terms contained herein
conflict with the terms of use or other terms and guidelines
contained within any such website, then the terms of use and other
terms and guidelines for such website shall prevail.
Wealth BuildingFixed Income & BondsForex, Gold & Alternative InvestmentsInvestment StrategiesStocks, ETFs & Trading
17 April 2026 I 6 mins read
Just how much should investors worry about high oil prices? Amid the ongoing Middle East conflict, it is not surprising that investors are focused on energy prices, given these remain the main channel to global financial markets. Many have been surprised, though, by the uneven impact across different markets. For example, many Asian equities have faced significant volatility, but the pullback in US equities has so far been relatively muted.
While we should not be complacent about downside risks, it is equally important to recognise that many asset classes now offer attractive opportunities and are likely to continue to do so if worst-case scenarios fail to play out.
Why this isn’t a 1970s sequel
The 1970s oil crises involved two major supply shocks – the 1973 Arab oil embargo and the 1979 Iranian Revolution – which nearly quadrupled oil prices, triggered global stagflation (a debilitating combination of sustained high inflation and stagnant economic growth) and created severe fuel shortages.
Given this historical precedent, one would have thought that the recent Brent crude oil price rise of about 75% since mid-February would have resulted in markets focusing entirely on an upcoming inflation shock, recession risk and a stagflationary world ahead. However, over the same period, US equities have fallen by less than 5% and the 10-year US government bond yield is below 4.5% – not exactly the growth or inflation shock one would have expected, given the staggering 75% rise in oil prices.
The clue sits in ‘energy intensity’ – the amount of oil or gas needed per unit of GDP growth. Since the 1970s, energy intensity has fallen dramatically.
The World Bank, for instance, estimates that the amount of oil required to generate one unit of global GDP growth fell from 0.12 tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) in 1970 to 0.05 toe in 2022 – about a 58% reduction. Researchers at the Harvard Kennedy School found that the amount of oil required to generate USD1,000 of global GDP fell by an average of 1.5 litres each year from 1984 onwards. S&P Global estimates that oil prices would have to rise to the USD150-200 range to have a macroeconomic impact similar to historical energy shocks over the past 60 years.
The bottom line? Oil prices hovering around USD100/bbl are high, but not as high as they were for the global economy during historical energy price shocks.
Trust market resilience, but hedge the risks
The purpose of this perspective is not to foster complacency. Rather, it is to remind us that both risks and opportunities lie in front of us.
We certainly believe it is worthwhile to hedge against risks. Today’s USD100/bbl oil prices are expected to result in at least a moderate rise in inflation. However, a significant energy shock would involve either a rise towards levels that had an impact previously, such as USD150-200/bbl, or would result from prices staying above USD100/bbl for a prolonged period, pushing the average price higher for the year.
Our preferred hedges include inflation-protected bonds, which directly hedge yields against the US inflation index, and oil-correlated equities, such as energy sector stocks. Gold would also be an attractive hedge against a more stagflationary environment.
Hunting for value amid uncertainty
Downside risks notwithstanding, our baseline view continues to be that the current energy supply disruption is likely to be relatively short-lived. In this scenario, it would make sense first and foremost to stay invested in well-diversified portfolios, which in themselves offer an attractive entry point for long-term investors. More specifically, we would look for opportunities in asset classes that may post the strongest rebound if the high energy price threat recedes.
Top of our shopping list would be Asian equities, which have fallen significantly over the past month alongside higher oil prices and a stronger US dollar. This makes sense, given their relatively higher growth and balance-of-payment sensitivity to both oil prices and the USD. However, an easing of energy supply disruptions and lower oil prices is a scenario in which Asian equities may post the strongest recovery as downside risks are priced out.
Ultimately, the goal isn’t just to survive the oil price spike, but to thrive beyond it. The current oil shock may very well prove to be a pivotal bargain-hunting opportunity this year.
Your feedback is valuable to us. Did you find this article helpful?
Disclaimer
This article is for general information only and it does not constitute an offer, recommendation or solicitation of an offer to enter into any transaction or adopt any hedging, trading or investment strategy, in relation to any securities or other financial instruments. This article has not been prepared for any particular person or class of persons and does not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice or an investment recommendation. It has been prepared without regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any person or class of persons. You should seek advice from a licensed or an exempt financial adviser on the suitability of a product for you, taking into account these factors before making a commitment to purchase any product or invest in an investment. In the event that you choose not to seek advice from a licensed or an exempt financial adviser, you should carefully consider whether the product or service described herein is suitable for you.
You are fully responsible for your investment decision, including whether the investment is suitable for you. The products/services involved are not principal-protected and you may lose all or part of your original investment amount.
Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited will not accept any responsibility or liability of any kind, with respect to the accuracy or completeness of information in this article.
Deposit Insurance Scheme
Singapore dollar deposits of non-bank depositors are insured by the Singapore Deposit Insurance Corporation, for up to S$100,000 in aggregate per depositor per Scheme member by law. For clarity, these investment products are not deposits and do not qualify as an insured deposit under the Singapore Deposit Insurance and Policy Owners’ Protection Schemes Act 2011. Foreign currency deposits, dual currency investments, structured deposits and other investment products are not insured.
The information stated in this article is accurate as at the date of publication.
Access the latest house views from our Chief Investment Office