Disclaimer

This is to inform that by clicking on the hyperlink, you will be leaving sc.com/sg and entering a website operated by other parties.

Such links are only provided on our website for the convenience of the Client and Standard Chartered Bank does not control or endorse such websites, and is not responsible for their contents.

The use of such website is also subject to the terms of use and other terms and guidelines, if any, contained within each such website. In the event that any of the terms contained herein conflict with the terms of use or other terms and guidelines contained within any such website, then the terms of use and other terms and guidelines for such website shall prevail.

Thank you for visiting www.sc.com/sg


Proceed
  1. Home
  2. Portfolio defence and the safe-haven basket
svg iconsvg icon
Portfolio defence and the safe-haven basket
Manpreet Gill Chief Investment Officer of Africa, Middle East and Europe
Wealth BuildingFixed Income & BondsForex, Gold & Alternative InvestmentsInvestment StrategiesStocks, ETFs & Trading
2 June 2026  I   6 mins read

Does the perfect hedge exist? Investors have long sought relatively stable assets that can help balance the more volatile asset classes in their investment portfolios. Gold, long woven into the commercial and cultural fabric of many societies around the world, has been a long-standing port of call for this purpose. Over time, though, modern finance has introduced several other options.

Across recent decades, high-quality bonds have offered a counter-ballast to equities, as have defensive currencies, such as the Japanese Yen and the Swiss Franc. Yet, instead of searching for a silver bullet for portfolio protection, we believe the answer lies in holding a safe-haven basket. To understand why, one must look at how individual safe havens have historically crumbled when investors relied solely on it.

Unmasking the cracks in safe havens

The year 2022 was, in many respects, the great unmasking. As the Fed embarked on one of its most aggressive tightening cycles in decades, equities and bonds fell simultaneously – an unusual breakdown of the negative correlation that had underpinned diversified portfolios for decades. While this was just one year, the failure of bonds to maintain a negative correlation with stocks raised important questions about their role in diversification. With the benefit of hindsight, 2022 illustrated that high-quality bonds may not act as safe havens when the volatility event is driven by rising inflation.

The failure was not isolated in the fixed-income market. Safe-haven currencies likewise failed to play that role in many specific instances. In 2022, as the Fed raised rates aggressively, the Bank of Japan maintained yield curve control. This meant that, instead of holding firm as a safe haven, the Yen fell sharply past 150 against the US dollar – its weakest level in over three decades. Instead of acting as a portfolio refuge, the Yen ended up being one of the worst-performing major currencies of the year. The Swiss Franc, too,has its own cautionary chapter. In January 2015, the Swiss National Bank abruptly abandoned its currency floor against the Euro, triggering a rapid surge in the Franc. While the currency strengthened in this instance, the scale of volatility in the pair was arguably more than a safe haven would normally display.

Gold, too, has had its episodic disappointments. Its long history as a safe haven asset notwithstanding, during the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, gold lost value. While its drawdown was more muted than the more dramatic fall in equities at the time, in this instance, gold only helped dampen volatility rather than provide the negative correlation often expected of safe havens.

Constructing a multi-layered shield

History suggests that the perfect safe haven does not exist. Bonds can struggle when inflation concerns dominate, while safe-haven currencies often falter when central bank policy overrides their defensive characteristics. Gold, meanwhile, underperformed when investors needed to raise liquidity. However, what stands out to us is that these vulnerabilities are not always correlated.

Just as one does not drive by only looking in the rearview mirror, relying on a single asset class risks defending against the last crisis rather than preparing for the next one. By holding all three asset classes (bonds, gold and defensive currencies) instead, one can stop trying to predict the exact nature of the next economic shock and ensure collective defence for portfolio protection.

Sifting through the short-term noise around gold

Historical context is vital when assessing the modern market, where, in recent weeks, questions have once again been raised about gold’s reliability as a hedge. The precious metal has experienced renewed volatility, pulling back from record highs as markets digest shifting rate expectations and a still-strong appetite for equities. The short-term weakness is consistent with gold’s well-documented sensitivity to real (net-of-inflation) yields, given most major government bond markets have witnessed considerable upside pressure on bond yields due to higher inflation.

In our view, though, this recent volatility is not a reason to abandon our Overweight stance on the asset class. Gold maintains an attractive track record as a safe haven in several possible risk scenarios. Today, one ‘worry scenario’ entails oil prices placing upward pressure on inflation and downside pressure on growth. Over the past 5-6 decades, gold has actually stood out as an outperformer when markets have worried about such ‘stagflationary’ risks. This arguably earns gold a place today in a basket of safe havens, even if short-term returns have been more volatile.

Crucially, gold’s modern appeal extends far beyond historical cycles. What makes gold’s case so much more compelling today is the continued evidence of structural central bank demand. World Gold Council data shows that central banks, particularly in emerging markets, continue to diversify reserves into gold. With the share of gold in emerging market central
bank reserves still at relatively low levels, we see little reason for this trend to reverse for the time being.

Gold, bonds and defensive currencies each possess distinct vulnerabilities, but they rarely fail with equal magnitude simultaneously. True portfolio resilience requires a blended approach so that when one defensive pillar is tested, the others stand firm.

Your feedback is valuable to us. Did you find this article helpful?

Disclaimer

This article is for general information only and it does not constitute an offer, recommendation or solicitation of an offer to enter into any transaction or adopt any hedging, trading or investment strategy, in relation to any securities or other financial instruments. This article has not been prepared for any particular person or class of persons and does not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice or an investment recommendation. It has been prepared without regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any person or class of persons. You should seek advice from a licensed or an exempt financial adviser on the suitability of a product for you, taking into account these factors before making a commitment to purchase any product or invest in an investment. In the event that you choose not to seek advice from a licensed or an exempt financial adviser, you should carefully consider whether the product or service described herein is suitable for you.

You are fully responsible for your investment decision, including whether the investment is suitable for you. The products/services involved are not principal-protected and you may lose all or part of your original investment amount.

Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited will not accept any responsibility or liability of any kind, with respect to the accuracy or completeness of information in this article.

Deposit Insurance Scheme

Singapore dollar deposits of non-bank depositors are insured by the Singapore Deposit Insurance Corporation, for up to S$100,000 in aggregate per depositor per Scheme member by law. For clarity, these investment products are not deposits and do not qualify as an insured deposit under the Singapore Deposit Insurance and Policy Owners’ Protection Schemes Act 2011. Foreign currency deposits, dual currency investments, structured deposits and other investment products are not insured.

The information stated in this article is accurate as at the date of publication.

Access the latest house views from our Chief Investment Office
Find out more